Ocular Octopus
Todd Walker’s photography ephemera: theory, craft, failure, success, learning. Read, enjoy, share, discard.

→ About
→ Bay Area Galleries
→ NYC Galleries
→ SoCal Galleries
→ #fotochat

Heroes & Mentors: Stephen Shore and Gregory Crewdson

Crewdson: Were your pictures making a commentary of any kind or was it more of a formal investigation? 
Shore: Any artist can deal with both content and structure at the same time and have two paths of exploration, so I think they were both going on. In formal terms I wanted to make pictures that looked—the way I put it at the time was “natural.” Today I might use: “less mediated by visual convention.” What was it like to look? What was it like to see the world? And how is that different from the way people photograph? This was part of my interest in snapshots. Every now and then one would come across a snapshot that had this raw, unmediated spontaneity and I wanted to use the form of the pictures to refer to that. At the same time I was also taking pictures that you would never see in a snapshot and so it plays against the form.

(Source: ninaperlman)

 |   August 9 2011   |  12 notes  

  1. reinfriedmarass liked this
  2. robechlin liked this
  3. ocularoctopus reblogged this from ninaperlman
  4. quis reblogged this from jesuisperdu
  5. sexyfrenchfries liked this
  6. thesemightysecrets liked this
  7. jorisvandecatseye liked this
  8. vivienayroles liked this
  9. mienmachine liked this
  10. jesuisperdu liked this
  11. jesuisperdu reblogged this from ninaperlman
  12. ninaperlman posted this
Back   |   Next
twentyten by Justin Waggoner