“a camera can only deal with the visible. A photographer trying to communicate his or her perception of the currents below the surface of things has to find instances where these currents are visibly manifest.”
Books on Books #9 Paul Graham: Beyond Caring Essays by David Chandler, Jeffrey Ladd Hardcover w/ Dustjacket 104 pp, 9.5 x 7 in. 50 Color illustrations ISBN: 978-1-935004-16-5 $39.95 Release date: February 2011 Limited Edition Set also available
Publishers Description:
published in 1986 is now considered one of the key works from Britain’s wave of “New Color” photography that was gaining momentum in the 1980s. While commissioned to present his view of “Britain in 1984,” Graham turned his attention towards the waiting rooms, queues and poor conditions of overburdened Social Security and Unemployment offices across the United Kingdom. Photographing surreptitiously, his camera is both witness and protagonist within a bureaucratic system that speaks to the humiliation and indignity aimed towards the most vulnerable end of society. Books on Books #9 presents every page spread of Graham’s controversial book along with a contemporary essay by writer and curator David Chandler.
Walnut Creek to San Francisco, twice a day, five days a week. Photographing the daily commute, being present in the now with an unsophisticated camera and captive to a time and place. Twenty-four photographs, sixteen pages, six bucks.
“Mornings/Evenings”, my follow up to “Weld”, should be available in a few weeks. Just finished the edit and layout and ordered the publisher’s proof from MagCloud.
“I think a photographer has to measure what lines he’s willing to cross and what becomes worth it to make a picture. I think Walker Evans talks about having certain anxieties about making a photograph or not, and then feeling nervous about it. His answer for that is simple. It’s like, if I don’t make this picture it won’t be made, right?”
An essential element of any art is risk. If you don’t take a risk then how are you going to make something really beautiful, that hasn’t been seen before? I always like to say that cinema without risk is like having no sex and expecting to have a baby. You have to take a risk.
“… if you say that artists take ‘risks,’ it’s insulting to the men who landed on D-Day, to stunt men, to baby-sitters, to Evel Knievel, to stepdaughters, to coal miners, and to hitch-hikers, because they’re the ones who really know what ‘risks’ are.” She didn’t even hear me, she was still thinking about what glamorous “risks” artists take.
“They always say new art is bad for a while, and that’s the risk—that’s the pain you have to have for fame.” (…)
“No,” I said. “It’s not new art. You don’t know it’s new. You don’t know what it is. It doesn’t become new until about ten years later, because then it looks new.”
“If you spend your life working on something that you love, and you never have success with it, well, at least you spent your life doing something that you love. And by doing something that you love, you vastly improve the chances that you will have success with it. Because the worse case scenario is to give up your entire life to work on something that you don’t love and end up having no success with it. So then at the end of your life you look back and you say ‘Oh, I compromised and had no success.’”
“There is a pathos of complaint, criticism and negativity that permeates our media culture. Wait, actually it permeates our entire social structure. It’s really not useful. In fact, it’s downright dangerous. The words we utter are expressions of the ideas that fill our minds (and often our hearts). To effect a change at the level of culture may sound impossible. But it isn’t. To acclaim, praise and search for the positive takes a bit more energy, and if anything, it just feels different than complaining, criticizing and being negative. Yet, it has wide-ranging effects in our world and social interactions.”
“Bellocq had Friedlander. Atget had Abbot. Disfarmer had Miller. Without their discoverers, these photographers might still be anonymous. For Maier it’s been John Maloof. An interesting mental experiment is to wonder what would’ve happened had Maier posted her own photos on a blog while still alive. Would they have the same impact? Or would they just be another series of old images from some self-promoting has-been?”